Harper’s
We’re heading into what could be a long and hot summer. It might come with more of the climate-related craziness that accompanied last summer.
Against this backdrop, Stephen Harper’s Conservatives are busy working on a new
Time is of the essence. There is Kyoto trouble at the federal level. One of the ENVI committee members, Pablo Rodriguez (Lib., Honoré-Mercier), has introduced a private member’s bill designed to force the Conservatives to live up to Kyoto by enforcing the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA). You will recall that carbon dioxide (CO2) was added to Schedule 1 of the CEPA in November 2005. This means the government now has a statutory obligation to regulate CO2 emissions—i.e., to take action on Kyoto.
The House rises at the end of June, which gives Rodriguez very little time to launch his gambit and make it stick. But a Conservative insider tells me that the statutory CEPA review, now in progress, will occupy ENVI’s attention until “at least Christmas.” So even this go-around fizzles, the opposition might be still able to do something when the House sits again in September—if the government fails to come up with a credible plan between now and then.
When you consider the Parliamentary arithmetic, you see that it is entirely possible for them to successfully make trouble. There are twelve members on ENVI, seven opposition and five government. A united opposition could force the agenda.
Their chances for success will improve if Harper fails to formulate a credible climate change plan. If his plan proves attackable, then it depends on the opposition’s ability to collaborate long enough to force the issue.
Harper will have a tough job putting together a plan. This is because it’s not so much a matter of numbers as politics.
Consider the fact that not a single print-media story on
This is not because people don’t understand the numbers that underlie the positions. It is because
Well, fair’s fair, and it is good to give the green lobby a voice. But when they fail to come up with a coherent and credible alternative to nuclear power—and they have failed in this case—then somebody has to call them on it. Neither the government nor the non-Post print media has done this yet in public. Eventually somebody has to turn some critical attention to what green groups have been actually saying.
Until this happens, and there is little indication it will, Harper’s
And now, to make things even more interesting,
Will Dalton McGuinty ask for the same thing? The anti-nuke crowd is worried that he will, and is warning the rest of
How will the feds respond if McGuinty makes such a demand? Does Stephen Harper have any desire to fund
The Toronto Star—
This will be an interesting summer. Stay tuned. And GO OILERS!!!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home